Inspired by Jonah Goldberg's
The Tyranny of Cliches, the
Heritage Foundation takes a look at the most-used conservative cliches:
“America Is a Christian Nation”
Yes, Christian morals and many biblical principles influenced the
American Founders. And, yes, Christianity has thrived in America. But America is not a Christian nation in the strict sense of the term:
Christianity isn’t the official religion to the exclusion of all
others, nor is it the basis for membership in the political community.
The better way to defend Christianity’s place in the public square is
by arguing for religious liberty. The Founders all agreed that
practitioners of every faith have a right to the free exercise of their
religion—in their houses of worship and in the public square. They
enshrined that right in the First Amendment. Why use an inaccurate cliché when you have the original meaning of the First Amendment on your side?
“States’ Rights”
Nowhere in the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution are
states or any other government—federal, state, or local—said to possess
rights. Rather, states have powers. The much beloved, if often ignored, Tenth Amendment
says that “the powers not delegated to the United States by the
Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the
States respectively, or to the people.”
Not only is it incorrect to speak of states’ rights, but the
expression was the rallying cry of segregationists. Since no
right-thinking conservative abides such arguments, let’s just drop the
term “states’ rights” once and for all.
If you’re concerned about federal encroachments on state sovereignty
or the erosion of federalism—as you should be—then speak of federal
encroachments on state sovereignty or the erosion of federalism. Or, of
the need to restore limited constitutional government, reinvigorate
local self-government, decentralize power, and check the growth of
out-of-control government.
With so many great formulations to choose from, why weaken the case for liberty by relying on the phrase “states’ rights”?
“That’s Socialism”
American conservatives needlessly undermine their arguments by
labeling every liberal program or policy as “socialism.” This claim is
incorrect: American liberals are generally progressives, not socialists.
Conservatives need not rely on the s-word to argue against liberals—there’s plenty wrong with progressivism.
Better yet, demonstrate what’s wrong in principle and in practice with a
particular liberal program instead of relying on a debatable label.
“Small Government”
We conservatives are against “big government,” so we must be for “small government,” right? Wrong. We’re for limited government.
The Constitution creates a federal government of enumerated (i.e.,
limited) powers. When Congress acts within its legitimate scope—for
instance, national defense—then it can do a lot. There is nothing
inherently contradictory about a limited-government conservative
supporting strong national defense, because that is within the federal
government’s constitutional responsibility. On the other hand, for areas
outside of the federal government’s constitutional scope (Obamacare,
anyone?), there is no role—big, small, or medium.
No comments:
Post a Comment