Sunday, April 14, 2013

Liberal Hypocrisy and the Limits of the Right to Choose

Steve Hayward has some thoughts on the liberal hypocrisy in regards to the case of abrtionist Kermit Gosnell and how, ala Newt Gingrich, Republicans should turn the tables on questions from the MSM designed to carry water for the pro-choice side:

Liberals and the media are still dining out on Rep. Todd Akin’s famous face-plant about “legitimate rape” that, in conjunction with Richard Mourdoch’s similar mis-step in Indiana, didn’t just cost the GOP two winnable Senate seats, but might have cost them the Senate and the presidential election as well. The competent answer to that question in a political campaign, of course, would have been to go on the attack, with a line of reasoning that goes something like this: “I notice that you pro-abortion reporters so in the bag for the abortion industry that you have to default to the most extreme case in order to defend your friends, and never ask ‘pro-choice’ politicians about the extreme cases on their side. Please tell me how many times you or anyone else in the media has ever asked Barack Obama why he voted in favor of infanticide when he voted against Illinois’s ‘Infants Born Alive Protection Act,’ the same kind of statute that is at the root of the prosecution of Dr. Gosnell in Philadelphia that you’re also ignoring right now.”

You would think the media would be a little curious in knowing just when the other side thinks the right to choose ends and life begins.  The third trimester?  A few hours after birth?  In the car on the way home?  Or do they believe in infanticide like then-state senator Obama who, in 2003, said that once abortion was decided upon, that that constitutional right trumped all other considerations, even if the baby was born alive?

No comments:

Post a Comment