President Obama has lately been claiming the mantle of a fiscal conservative when it comes to spending,
claiming that federal spending under his watch has slowed to rates unseen since the Eisenhower Administration.
Ed Morrissey at Hot Air takes a closer look at the numbers and finds these claims to be just a little short of the truth:
The last fully Republican budget was FY2007, which came in at $2.77
trillion. The last Bush/Democrat budget was FY2008, which was $2.982
trillion. The FY2009 budget, which Obama signed into law and which was
passed by a Democrat-controlled Congress, was $3.517 trillion with a
$1.4 trillion deficit. That’s a year-on-year increase of nearly 18%,
and those numbers come straight from the White House website.
If you prefer the figures in percentage of GDP, as Kessler noted
yesterday, we went from 20.8% of GDP in FY2008 to 25.2% in FY2009, which
is an increase of 22% year on year.
Nor does it get any better. Using FY2008 as the baseline comparison,
FY2010′s budget was $3.456 trillion, an increase of 15.88% over the
last Bush/Democrat budget. FY2011′s $3.603 trillion budget was a 20.8%
increase, and FY2012′s projected $3.795 trillion (the White House
projection, mind you) is an increase of 27.26% over the last Bush budget
— in just four budget years. An argument that this is a
demonstration of fiscal discipline would have to come straight out of
the pages of George Orwell’s 1984.
No comments:
Post a Comment